M365 Exchange Inbox Rule with Obfuscated Name


Description

Identifies when a Microsoft Exchange inbox rule is created or modified with a name composed only of special characters. Adversaries may use obfuscated inbox rule names to evade detection, hide malicious forwarding or deletion rules, or blend in with benign audit noise. The rule name is parsed from "o365.audit.ObjectId", which encodes the mailbox identity and rule name separated by a backslash.

Query · esql

from logs-o365.audit-* metadata _id, _version, _index
| where
    data_stream.dataset == "o365.audit" and
    event.provider == "Exchange" and
    event.action in ("New-InboxRule", "Set-InboxRule") and
    event.outcome == "success" and
    o365.audit.ObjectId is not null
| grok o365.audit.ObjectId """.*\\\\(?<Esql.inbox_rule_name>.*)$"""
// only special chars in inbox rule name
| where Esql.inbox_rule_name rlike """[!@#$%^&*()_+={[\]|\\:;"'<,>.?/~` \-]+"""
| keep
    @timestamp,
    _id,
    _version,
    _index,
    Esql.inbox_rule_name,
    o365.audit.ObjectId,
    o365.audit.UserId,
    o365.audit.ApplicationId,
    user.name,
    user.domain,
    event.action,
    source.ip,
    source.as.number,
    source.as.organization.name,
    o365.audit.Parameters.ForwardTo,
    o365.audit.Parameters.ForwardAsAttachmentTo,
    o365.audit.Parameters.RedirectTo

Investigation fields

Pivot points the source recommends for triage.

  • @timestamp
  • Esql.inbox_rule_name
  • o365.audit.ObjectId
  • o365.audit.UserId
  • user.name
  • user.domain
  • event.action
  • source.ip
  • source.as.organization.name
  • o365.audit.Parameters.ForwardTo
  • o365.audit.Parameters.ForwardAsAttachmentTo
  • o365.audit.Parameters.RedirectTo

Known false positives

  • Rare legitimate automation or third-party tools may create inbox rules with non-alphanumeric names. Validate against known messaging workflows and approved admin scripts before escalating.

Analyst notes

Investigating M365 Exchange Inbox Rule with Obfuscated Name

This rule flags New-InboxRule and Set-InboxRule activity where the inbox rule name extracted from o365.audit.ObjectId contains only special characters. Attackers use these names to make malicious rules harder to spot in the Microsoft 365 compliance portal and security tooling.

Because this rule uses ESQL grok and keep, review the original o365.audit documents for full rule parameters (o365.audit.Parameters.*) such as forwarding, deletion, or move actions.

Possible investigation steps

  • Review Esql.inbox_rule_name and o365.audit.ObjectId to confirm the parsed rule identity and mailbox path.
  • Identify the actor using o365.audit.UserId and correlate with Entra ID sign-in logs for the same source.ip.
  • Inspect event.action to determine whether the rule was newly created or modified.
  • Review kept forwarding and redirect parameters (ForwardTo, ForwardAsAttachmentTo, ForwardingAddress, RedirectTo, RedirectToRecipients) for external destinations outside user.domain.
  • Pull the source event and review o365.audit.Parameters for DeleteMessage, MoveToFolder, or SubjectContainsWords that indicate evasion or exfiltration intent.
  • Hunt for other inbox rules from the same user or IP with standard or obfuscated names.

False positive analysis

  • Internal scripts that programmatically name rules with symbols may match. Document approved senders and exclude if necessary.
  • Broken or partial ObjectId values can affect grok extraction; verify the parsed name in the raw audit record.

Response and remediation

  • Remove the inbox rule from the affected mailbox if unauthorized.
  • Reset credentials and revoke sessions for the user if compromise is suspected.
  • Review the tenant for additional malicious inbox or transport rules from the same source IP.
Raw source M365 Exchange Inbox Rule with Obfuscated Name · Elastic TOML
Esc
Published by elastic/detection-rules ↗, licensed under Elastic License 2.0 ↗. Reproduced here unmodified.
[metadata]
creation_date = "2026/05/27"
integration = ["o365"]
maturity = "production"
updated_date = "2026/05/27"

[rule]
author = ["Elastic"]
description = """
Identifies when a Microsoft Exchange inbox rule is created or modified with a name composed only of special characters.
Adversaries may use obfuscated inbox rule names to evade detection, hide malicious forwarding or deletion rules, or blend
in with benign audit noise. The rule name is parsed from "o365.audit.ObjectId", which encodes the mailbox identity and
rule name separated by a backslash.
"""
false_positives = [
    """
    Rare legitimate automation or third-party tools may create inbox rules with non-alphanumeric names. Validate against
    known messaging workflows and approved admin scripts before escalating.
    """,
]
from = "now-9m"
language = "esql"
license = "Elastic License v2"
name = "M365 Exchange Inbox Rule with Obfuscated Name"
note = """## Triage and analysis

### Investigating M365 Exchange Inbox Rule with Obfuscated Name

This rule flags `New-InboxRule` and `Set-InboxRule` activity where the inbox rule name extracted from
`o365.audit.ObjectId` contains only special characters. Attackers use these names to make malicious rules harder to spot
in the Microsoft 365 compliance portal and security tooling.

Because this rule uses ESQL `grok` and `keep`, review the original `o365.audit` documents for full rule parameters
(`o365.audit.Parameters.*`) such as forwarding, deletion, or move actions.

### Possible investigation steps

- Review `Esql.inbox_rule_name` and `o365.audit.ObjectId` to confirm the parsed rule identity and mailbox path.
- Identify the actor using `o365.audit.UserId` and correlate with Entra ID sign-in logs for the same `source.ip`.
- Inspect `event.action` to determine whether the rule was newly created or modified.
- Review kept forwarding and redirect parameters (`ForwardTo`, `ForwardAsAttachmentTo`, `ForwardingAddress`,
   `RedirectTo`, `RedirectToRecipients`) for external destinations outside `user.domain`.
- Pull the source event and review `o365.audit.Parameters` for `DeleteMessage`, `MoveToFolder`, or
  `SubjectContainsWords` that indicate evasion or exfiltration intent.
- Hunt for other inbox rules from the same user or IP with standard or obfuscated names.

### False positive analysis

- Internal scripts that programmatically name rules with symbols may match. Document approved senders and exclude if
  necessary.
- Broken or partial `ObjectId` values can affect grok extraction; verify the parsed name in the raw audit record.

### Response and remediation

- Remove the inbox rule from the affected mailbox if unauthorized.
- Reset credentials and revoke sessions for the user if compromise is suspected.
- Review the tenant for additional malicious inbox or transport rules from the same source IP.
"""
references = ["https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2026/04/06/ai-enabled-device-code-phishing-campaign-april-2026/"]
risk_score = 47
rule_id = "1c3d9346-4591-4894-935c-dad2824850f2"
severity = "medium"
tags = [
    "Domain: Cloud",
    "Domain: SaaS",
    "Domain: Email",
    "Data Source: Microsoft 365",
    "Data Source: Microsoft 365 Audit Logs",
    "Use Case: Threat Detection",
    "Tactic: Defense Evasion",
    "Resources: Investigation Guide",
]
timestamp_override = "event.ingested"
type = "esql"

query = '''
from logs-o365.audit-* metadata _id, _version, _index
| where
    data_stream.dataset == "o365.audit" and
    event.provider == "Exchange" and
    event.action in ("New-InboxRule", "Set-InboxRule") and
    event.outcome == "success" and
    o365.audit.ObjectId is not null
| grok o365.audit.ObjectId """.*\\\\(?<Esql.inbox_rule_name>.*)$"""
// only special chars in inbox rule name
| where Esql.inbox_rule_name rlike """[!@#$%^&*()_+={[\]|\\:;"'<,>.?/~` \-]+"""
| keep
    @timestamp,
    _id,
    _version,
    _index,
    Esql.inbox_rule_name,
    o365.audit.ObjectId,
    o365.audit.UserId,
    o365.audit.ApplicationId,
    user.name,
    user.domain,
    event.action,
    source.ip,
    source.as.number,
    source.as.organization.name,
    o365.audit.Parameters.ForwardTo,
    o365.audit.Parameters.ForwardAsAttachmentTo,
    o365.audit.Parameters.RedirectTo
'''

[rule.investigation_fields]
field_names = [
    "@timestamp",
    "Esql.inbox_rule_name",
    "o365.audit.ObjectId",
    "o365.audit.UserId",
    "user.name",
    "user.domain",
    "event.action",
    "source.ip",
    "source.as.organization.name",
    "o365.audit.Parameters.ForwardTo",
    "o365.audit.Parameters.ForwardAsAttachmentTo",
    "o365.audit.Parameters.RedirectTo"
]

[[rule.threat]]
framework = "MITRE ATT&CK"

[[rule.threat.technique]]
id = "T1564"
name = "Hide Artifacts"
reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1564/"

[[rule.threat.technique.subtechnique]]
id = "T1564.008"
name = "Email Hiding Rules"
reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1564/008/"

[rule.threat.tactic]
id = "TA0005"
name = "Defense Evasion"
reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0005/"

[[rule.threat]]
framework = "MITRE ATT&CK"

[[rule.threat.technique]]
id = "T1137"
name = "Office Application Startup"
reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1137/"

[[rule.threat.technique.subtechnique]]
id = "T1137.005"
name = "Outlook Rules"
reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1137/005/"

[rule.threat.tactic]
id = "TA0003"
name = "Persistence"
reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0003/"

Detection rules belong to the projects that publish them and remain under their own licenses. This site indexes and links to them; it claims no rights in them.