Cross-source coverage

T1036.009 / ATT&CK

Masquerading: Break Process Trees

7 rules across 2 sources.

From MITRE ATT&CK 19.2

An adversary may attempt to evade process tree-based analysis by modifying executed malware's parent process ID (PPID). If endpoint protection software leverages the “parent-child" relationship for detection, breaking this relationship could result in the adversary’s behavior not being associated with previous process tree activity. On Unix-based systems breaking this process tree is common practice for administrators to execute software using scripts and programs.

On Linux systems, adversaries may execute a series of Native API calls to alter malware's process tree. For example, adversaries can execute their payload without any arguments, call the fork() API call twice, then have the parent process exit. This creates a grandchild process with no parent process that is immediately adopted by the init system process (PID 1), which successfully disconnects the execution of the adversary's payload from its previous process tree.

Another example is using the “daemon” syscall to detach from the current parent process and run in the background.

Tactics
Stealth
Platforms
Linux · macOS
Telemetry
auditd:SYSCALLmacos:unifiedlogfs:fsusage

How MITRE says to detect it DET0443

Detection Strategy for Masquerading via Breaking Process Trees

Linux Analytic 1223

Detects anomalous process execution patterns where a process's parent terminates quickly after process creation or is re-parented to 'init' (PID 1), often indicating double-fork or daemon-style detachment. These behaviors sever the parent-child relationship and obscure the execution origin in process tree analysis.

  • auditd:SYSCALL fork/clone/daemon syscall tracing
  • auditd:SYSCALL execve of re-parented process

macOS Analytic 1224

Detects execution patterns where a child process is detached from its original parent, often showing up under 'launchd' (PID 1) with no parent lineage. These breakages in the process tree are indicative of evasive techniques using `daemon()`, `fork()` or background execution flags.

  • macos:unifiedlog Process creation with parent PID of 1 (launchd)
  • fs:fsusage Detached process execution with no associated parent

elastic/detection-rules

5 rules
Detection Severity Format
Tampering with RUNNER_TRACKING_ID in GitHub Actions Runners Medium Elastic TOML
Unusual Execution from Kernel Thread (kthreadd) Parent Medium Elastic TOML
Unusual Parent-Child Relationship Medium Elastic TOML
Direct Process Execution via Background Utility Low Elastic TOML
Process Backgrounded by Unusual Parent Low Elastic TOML

splunk/security_content

2 rules
Detection Severity Format
Windows Svchost.exe Parent Process Anomaly Undefined SPL
Windows Unusual SysWOW64 Process Run System32 Executable Undefined SPL

Detection rules belong to the projects that publish them and remain under their own licenses. This site indexes and links to them; it claims no rights in them.