SQL Injection Strings In URI


Description

Detects potential SQL injection attempts via GET requests in access logs.

Query · sigma

selection:
  cs-method: GET
keywords:
- '@@version'
- '%271%27%3D%271'
- '=select '
- =select(
- =select%20
- concat_ws(
- CONCAT(0x
- from mysql.innodb_table_stats
- from%20mysql.innodb_table_stats
- group_concat(
- information_schema.tables
- json_arrayagg(
- or 1=1#
- or%201=1#
- 'order by '
- order%20by%20
- 'select * '
- select database()
- select version()
- select%20*%20
- select%20database()
- select%20version()
- select%28sleep%2810%29
- SELECTCHAR(
- table_schema
- UNION ALL SELECT
- UNION SELECT
- UNION%20ALL%20SELECT
- UNION%20SELECT
- '''1''=''1'
filter_main_status:
  sc-status: 404
condition: selection and keywords and not 1 of filter_main_*

Known false positives

  • Java scripts and CSS Files
  • User searches in search boxes of the respective website
  • Internal vulnerability scanners can cause some serious FPs when used, if you experience a lot of FPs due to this think of adding more filters such as "User Agent" strings and more response codes
Raw source SQL Injection Strings In URI · Sigma
Esc
Published by SigmaHQ/sigma ↗, licensed under Detection Rule License 1.1 ↗. Reproduced here unmodified.
title: SQL Injection Strings In URI
id: 5513deaf-f49a-46c2-a6c8-3f111b5cb453
status: test
description: Detects potential SQL injection attempts via GET requests in access logs.
references:
    - https://www.acunetix.com/blog/articles/exploiting-sql-injection-example/
    - https://www.acunetix.com/blog/articles/using-logs-to-investigate-a-web-application-attack/
    - https://brightsec.com/blog/sql-injection-payloads/
    - https://github.com/payloadbox/sql-injection-payload-list
    - https://book.hacktricks.xyz/pentesting-web/sql-injection/mysql-injection
author: Saw Win Naung, Nasreddine Bencherchali (Nextron Systems), Thurein Oo (Yoma Bank)
date: 2020-02-22
modified: 2023-09-04
tags:
    - attack.initial-access
    - attack.t1190
logsource:
    category: webserver
detection:
    selection:
        cs-method: 'GET'
    keywords:
        - '@@version'
        - '%271%27%3D%271'
        - '=select '
        - '=select('
        - '=select%20'
        - 'concat_ws('
        - 'CONCAT(0x'
        - 'from mysql.innodb_table_stats'
        - 'from%20mysql.innodb_table_stats'
        - 'group_concat('
        - 'information_schema.tables'
        - 'json_arrayagg('
        - 'or 1=1#'
        - 'or%201=1#'
        - 'order by '
        - 'order%20by%20'
        - 'select * '
        - 'select database()'
        - 'select version()'
        - 'select%20*%20'
        - 'select%20database()'
        - 'select%20version()'
        - 'select%28sleep%2810%29'
        - 'SELECTCHAR('
        - 'table_schema'
        - 'UNION ALL SELECT'
        - 'UNION SELECT'
        - 'UNION%20ALL%20SELECT'
        - 'UNION%20SELECT'
        - "'1'='1"
    filter_main_status:
        sc-status: 404
    condition: selection and keywords and not 1 of filter_main_*
falsepositives:
    - Java scripts and CSS Files
    - User searches in search boxes of the respective website
    - Internal vulnerability scanners can cause some serious FPs when used, if you experience a lot of FPs due to this think of adding more filters such as "User Agent" strings and more response codes
level: high

Detection rules belong to the projects that publish them and remain under their own licenses. This site indexes and links to them; it claims no rights in them.